[GRASS5] bugs

[Markus Neteler]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:30:00PM +1300, Hamish wrote:
...
> > > I think we need to have some sort of "confirmed", "unreproducable",
> > > or "new" tag column for bugs, so we can separate out valid bugs from
> > > misconfigured systems at least, giving a more realistic bug number.
> > 
> > or, old and unreproducible bugs could be just squashed?
> 
> GRASS is a huge program with many rare bugs. One can never test all
> platforms/setups, so you can never say unreproducible==mistaken report.
> Even if it is a mistake, if one person did it, others might as well, and
> the others in the future might figure it out & post a solution.
> Just deleting the contributed user experience would be a big mistake,
> IMO.

That's generally right, but RT should not become a museum for
unresolved bugs of old GRASS versions.


...
> 
> The bug list is so hard to find (for me) in the new website layout that

Were would you like to see it?

Markus