[GRASS5] Automated test-system for basic functionalities.
radim.blazek at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 10:22:04 EST 2006
On 1/10/06, Sören Gebbert <soerengebbert at gmx.de> wrote:
> But if the test description is a shell script the user/dev will have more options to write tests.
Do we need such options?
> We can define the test description in xml and write the framework in C/C++,
> but in this case im not able write the framework (i dont have the time and the knowledge). :(
No! I prefer something very simple. To use checksum is good idea.
My idea was to have test location with some input maps in PERMANENT.
Then the test descriptions could be a text file with GRASS commands
and list of output data to be verified + checkums for that data.
More information about the grass-dev