[R.li] [GRASS-dev] r.li

[Markus Neteler]

Paolo Cavallini wrote on 06/22/2006 09:51 AM:

> Hi Bejamin.
> My aim is to have r.li within grass (if Markus agree) when at least all
> basic indexes are ready and tested (hopefully within a couple of months,
> possibly less), so I do not know if GEM wrapping is worth the effort. On
> the other hand, if  r.li can be useful as a test case, then I'd be glad.
> Markus, what is your opinion on this?

Since I had added this "GEM" hint, I vote for GEM for the next
weeks/months :-)

This is a good occasion to find a serious GEM candidate. This will
(hopefully) stimulate the completion of GEM and generate docs etc
to get more people interested in using it.

Markus

> All the best.
> pc
>
> Benjamin Ducke wrote:
>
> >Paolo,
>
> >I just looked at the r.li archive and the README file.
> >It mentions installation via GEM and that it's currently
> >untested.
> >If you want, we can wrap up a GEM extension package
> >for r.li and possibly some other 3rd party modules
> >that are currently floating around and fit the landscape analysis theme.
>
> >You would then continue development insed the GEM extension
> >structure which is actually quite convenient. You can still
> >offer a non-GEM version on your website by simply extracting
> >the contents of the src directory.
>
> >Best,
>
> >Benjamin
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini
> email+jabber: cavallini at faunalia.it
> www.faunalia.it
> Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy   Tel: (+39)348-3801953


_______________________________________________
R.li mailing list
R.li at faunalia.com
http://www.faunalia.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r.li