[GRASS-dev] r.li

[Paolo Cavallini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Bejamin.
My aim is to have r.li within grass (if Markus agree) when at least all
basic indexes are ready and tested (hopefully within a couple of months,
possibly less), so I do not know if GEM wrapping is worth the effort. On
the other hand, if  r.li can be useful as a test case, then I'd be glad.
Markus, what is your opinion on this?
All the best.
pc

Benjamin Ducke wrote:
> Paolo,
> 
> I just looked at the r.li archive and the README file.
> It mentions installation via GEM and that it's currently
> untested.
> If you want, we can wrap up a GEM extension package
> for r.li and possibly some other 3rd party modules
> that are currently floating around and fit the landscape analysis theme.
> 
> You would then continue development insed the GEM extension
> structure which is actually quite convenient. You can still
> offer a non-GEM version on your website by simply extracting
> the contents of the src directory.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Benjamin
- --
Paolo Cavallini
email+jabber: cavallini at faunalia.it
www.faunalia.it
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy   Tel: (+39)348-3801953
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEmkvs/NedwLUzIr4RAiLVAKCKb8h7DWOkJn0OlRYbnm4PIX7SKQCeJeg7
kKkOw/Eg7u1Z+QLjm3lMJvg=
=Q3rl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----