[GRASS-dev] gis.m or d.m - can we make it optional?

[Sorokine, Alexandre]

Hi everybody!

I also would be very strongly in favor of this feature.  There is
currently some functionality that is easier to achieve in d.m rather
than in gis.m

--
Alex Sorokine, Ph.D. <sorokina at ornl.gov>
Oak Ridge National Lab
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: grass-dev-bounces at grass.itc.it 
> [mailto:grass-dev-bounces at grass.itc.it] On Behalf Of Stephan Holl
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: grass5-dev
> Subject: [GRASS-dev] gis.m or d.m - can we make it optional?
> 
> Dear List,
> 
> after having two great tcltk-based GRASS-GUIs I would love to have an
> option, env-var, or something else to change the default manager to
> ether gis.m or d.m.
> 
> It would be nice if the last used manager would be somewhat
> "recognized" by GRASS like the -gui or -text selection when you start
> GRASS next time.
> 
> I think this could be implemented somewhere in Init.sh, but I 
> could not
> find where this file is generated during compilation.
> 
> What would you think about that?
> 
> Best
> 
> 	Stephan
> 
> -- 
> GDF Hannover - Solutions for spatial data analysis and remote sensing
> Hannover Office      -     Mengendamm 16d      -     D-30177 Hannover
> Internet: www.gdf-hannover.de      -      Email: holl at gdf-hannover.de
> Phone : ++49-(0)511.39088507       -        Fax: ++49-(0)511.39088508
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at grass.itc.it
> http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>