[GRASS-dev] gis.m or d.m - can we make it optional?
Stephan Holl
holl at gdf-hannover.de
Thu May 18 08:33:05 EDT 2006
Hello Alexandre,
On Tue, 16 May 2006 14:26:49 -0400 "Sorokine, Alexandre"
<sorokina at ornl.gov> wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I also would be very strongly in favor of this feature. There is
> currently some functionality that is easier to achieve in d.m rather
> than in gis.m
I also like to have this done. I have prepared a simple patch which
"hacks" this one in.
Perhaps someone can have a look at the patch and correct it.
Best
Stephan
--
GDF Hannover - Solutions for spatial data analysis and remote sensing
Hannover Office - Mengendamm 16d - D-30177 Hannover
Internet: www.gdf-hannover.de - Email: holl at gdf-hannover.de
Phone : ++49-(0)511.39088507 - Fax: ++49-(0)511.39088508
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dm.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1676 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20060518/34c5f644/dm.bin
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list