[GRASS-dev] gis.m or d.m - can we make it optional?

Stephan Holl holl at gdf-hannover.de
Thu May 18 08:33:05 EDT 2006


Hello Alexandre,

On Tue, 16 May 2006 14:26:49 -0400 "Sorokine, Alexandre"
<sorokina at ornl.gov> wrote:

> Hi everybody!
> 
> I also would be very strongly in favor of this feature.  There is
> currently some functionality that is easier to achieve in d.m rather
> than in gis.m

I also like to have this done. I have prepared a simple patch which
"hacks" this one in.

Perhaps someone can have a look at the patch and correct it.

Best
	Stephan


-- 
GDF Hannover - Solutions for spatial data analysis and remote sensing
Hannover Office      -     Mengendamm 16d      -     D-30177 Hannover
Internet: www.gdf-hannover.de      -      Email: holl at gdf-hannover.de
Phone : ++49-(0)511.39088507       -        Fax: ++49-(0)511.39088508
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dm.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1676 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20060518/34c5f644/dm.bin


More information about the grass-dev mailing list