[GRASS-dev] r.le bugs--list needed

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Tue Sep 26 00:59:21 EDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, I would suggest to look seriously at r.li: it needs development,
but its structure should be more modern and modular, thus easier to
maintain than r.le (in fact, it was after trying to maintain r.le that
we decided to start with r.li). Serena is working on this, developing
new indices. It should be easy from this to add many more indices.
Please those interested note that we also have a mailing list specific
to the project (ready to merge in grass-dev when necessary).
All the best.
pc

William L. Baker ha scritto:
> Yes, as Markus suggests, perhaps before we dig into r.le and start cleaning it 
> up, I'd better look at r.li, which I don't yet have installed. More once I've 
> done that...
> 
> Bill Baker, Univ. of Wyoming
> 
> Brad Douglas wrote:
>> I completely read the original message wrong.  I thought you were making
>> a bug report for some reason.  Doh! :-)  I hadn't realized you were the
>> author.
>>
>> I believe the usages of stderr, stdout,etc. are proper, but there's a
>> push to get the modules to use G_message(), G_warning(),
>> G_fatal_error(), etc.  It'll be a large task that will eventually need
>> to be done.
>>
>> If you'd like some help, I can assist.  I'll go over the source again
>> and send you an email off list.  If you'll be actively working on it,
>> there's no need to remove it from CVS.
- --
Paolo Cavallini
email+jabber: cavallini at faunalia.it
www.faunalia.it
Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy   Tel: (+39)348-3801953
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFGLOp/NedwLUzIr4RAn7yAJoDvsIBoS9jGEW/HeEDFF8OnbBb3ACgtNjt
xQflgGg1086vTEWFVKOzrCg=
=Rua1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the grass-dev mailing list