[GRASS-dev] r.los segfaulting x86_64

[Benjamin Ducke]

So what was the actual fix?
I suppose the segmented memory management was dropped?

Benjamin

Hamish wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote:
>> Fixed in CVS.
> 
> FWIW I don't think a percent memory option was useful for r.los anyway, so no
> loss. The current method gets so slow by the time that the region is > 500x500,
> that by the time system memory was a problem it would take centuries to finish.
> 
> 
> Hamish
> 
> 
> 
>       ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better friend, newshound, and 
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
> 
> 

-- 
Benjamin Ducke, M.A.
Archäoinformatik
(Archaeoinformation Science)
Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte
(Inst. of Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology)
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Johanna-Mestorf-Straße 2-6
D 24098 Kiel
Germany

Tel.: ++49 (0)431 880-3378 / -3379
Fax : ++49 (0)431 880-7300
www.uni-kiel.de/ufg