[GRASS-dev] r.li (landscape indices)

[pallecch at cli.di.unipi.it]

ok, I'll change the names as Hamish suggests, but at this moment my pc 
is out of service and so I can't update r.li in the server. I can only 
send to you the new version of r.li.
-serena-

Quoting Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it>:

> Hi,
>
> I would really get this one solved... we are currently updating the
> GRASS book
> (3rd edition) and it would be a pain to either not write about r.li or
> to have
> the names wrong.
>
>
> Hamish wrote on 01/30/2007 12:45 AM:
>> serena wrote:
>>
>>> If there aren't problems I'll change r.li names.
>>>
> ...
>>> so:
>>>
>> [including Serena's updates]
>>
>>
>>> r.li.contrastWeightedEdgeDensity	will be	r.li.cwed
>>> r.li.dominance          will be          r.li.dominance
>>>
>>
>> nice
>>
>>
>>> r.li.edgedensity        will be          r.li.edgedens
>>>
>>
>> IMO r.li.edgedensity is preferable (16 chars).
>>
>>
>>> r.li.meanPatchSize          will be          r.li.meanps
>>> r.li.meanPixelAttribute     will be          r.li.meanpa
>>>
>>
>> similar enough to be confusing?
>> what about r.li.patchsize  or r.li.mps  ??
>>
>> I don't have very good ideas about the other one:
>>   r.li.pixelatt  ??   r.li.meanpixatt  ?? r.li.mpa  ??
>>   (of those I prefer r.li.mpa, ....)
>>
>>
>>> r.li.patchAreaDistributionCV          will be       r.li.padcv
>>> r.li.patchAreaDistributionRANGE       will be       r.li.padrange
>>> r.li.patchAreaDistributionSD          will be       r.li.padsd
>>>
>>
>> nice
>>
>>
>>> r.li.patchdensity           will be          r.li.patchdens
>>>
>>
>> IMO r.li.patchdensity is preferable (17 chars).
>>
>>
>>> r.li.patchnumber      will be          r.li.patchnum
>>> r.li.richness         will be          r.li.richness
>>> r.li.shannon          will be          r.li.shannon
>>> r.li.shape            will be          r.li.shape
>>> r.li.simpson          will be          r.li.simpson
>>>
>>
>> nice.
>>
>>
>>> also, because of the structure of r.li, I think is not a good idea to
>>> lump different modules.
>>>
>>
>> ok.
>>
>
> I mean, we can discuss this forever or just finally do it.
>
> thanks,
> Markus
>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.