[GRASS-dev] Re: g.rename consolidation

[Jáchym Čepický]

--verbose is here to set temporary GRASS_VERBOSE to heigher level, if
it is set to 0 or 1

so it makes sence to have it, but Im not sure, if it makes sence to
have it in the help message na all the manual pages..

j

2007/2/27, Hamish <hamish_nospam at yahoo.com>:
> Jáchym Èepický wrote:
> > In my opinion, GRASS modules are verbosed too much (e.g. see
> > r.terraflow). Message has for the user only then sence, if it is
> > error, warning or user will have to wait longer time (so G_percent
> > should be used imidietly after this). otherwise it is task for G_debug
> >
> > So basicly, I would like to remove most of the "closing maps" and
> > similar messages. if you want to inform the user about e.g. how many
> > points were processed, we should use fprintf to stdout for it, since
> > this is not a message, but a result...
>
> Rather than a full delete, if you wish to get rid of status/progress
> messages (for quick running modules) please move the messages to
> G_debug(1,"") etc. It would be nice to able to run with DEBUG=1 all the
> time without huge amounts of noise, so maybe some of the existing
> less interesting debug-1 messages could move to debug-2, etc.
>
> (without violating these rules from lib/gis/debug.c)
>  * Levels: (recommended levels)
>  * 1 - message is printed once or few times per module
>  * 3 - each row (raster) or line (vector)
>  * 5 - each cell (raster) or point (vector)
>
>
> I'm still not sure when to use --verbose vs. G_debug(1,).
> ie due to the existence of G_debug(1,) is there any need for --verbose?
> When to use one or the other? Do we really need --verbose at all?
>
> I think it is a pain to always advertise --verbose, when it is only used
> in a few modules. How are you supposed to guess that it does anything?
>
>
> thanks,
> Hamish
>


-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://www.les-ejk.cz/pgp/jachym_cepicky-gpg.pub