[GRASS-dev] G_program_name to every message

[Brad Douglas]

Oops.  I missed a key word when I read it: "debug".  Sorry.

On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 18:14 -0800, Brad Douglas wrote:
> No.  The only place that is appropriate is G_debug().  Average users
> could care less about that information and will likely complain about
> it.
> 
> On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 20:42 -0500, Daniel Calvelo wrote:
> > Hi Jachym. Great idea. I would condition that on the debug environment
> > variable. You might even consider adding __FILE__ and __LINE__
> > references then.
> > 
> > Daniel.
> > 
> > On 1/7/07, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at centrum.cz> wrote:
> > > Hallo,
> > >
> > > I think it would be nice, if G_message, G_warning and G_fatal_error
> > > would print module name at the beginning of the message.
> > >
> > > If the modules are used in scripts, it is sometimes difficult to
> > > identify, which C-module, used in the script, caused some problem or is
> > > printing the message. This is the case for e.g. r.report (file stats.c)
> > > too.
> > >
> > > What about adding G_program_name(); to every message, so that
> > >
> > >     G_message("Hallo, world!");
> > >
> > > would produce
> > >
> > >     g.module: Hallo, world!
> > >
> > > and
> > >     G_warning("Hallo, world!"); -> WARNING: g.module: Hallo, world!
> > >
> > > ??
> > >
> > > The question is, how to do it... Imho the best place is printf_error();
> > > in error.c
> > >
> > > What do you think?

-- 
Brad Douglas <rez touchofmadness com>                    KB8UYR/6
Address: 37.493,-121.924 / WGS84    National Map Corps #TNMC-3785