[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-user] Compiling grass 6.2.1: i.class error
Glynn Clements
glynn at gclements.plus.com
Wed Mar 14 08:10:17 EDT 2007
Hamish wrote:
> > Every other --without-* switch should work without requiring
> > additional effort from the user, but curses is currently sufficiently
> > ingrained that making --without-curses work nicely is too much effort
> > for a relatively obscure usage case.
>
> ./configure --help
> ...
> --with-glw support GLw functionality (default: no)
> ...
> --with-glw-includes=DIRS
> GLw include files are in DIRS
> --with-glw-libs=DIRS GLw library files are in DIRS
>
>
> Is GLw still relevant?
Only for r3.showdspf; it's no longer compiled by default (you need to
explicitly run "make -C raster3d/r3.showdspf" to build it), but it's
still in the source tree.
> If not, let's remove it.
Only if you are also going to remove raster3d/r3.showdspf. There's no
point having the r3.showdspf code in CVS if configure doesn't define
the variables which it requires.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list