[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-user] Compiling grass 6.2.1: i.class error

Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
Wed Mar 14 08:10:17 EDT 2007


Hamish wrote:

> > Every other --without-* switch should work without requiring
> > additional effort from the user, but curses is currently sufficiently
> > ingrained that making --without-curses work nicely is too much effort
> > for a relatively obscure usage case.
> 
> ./configure --help
> ...
>   --with-glw              support GLw functionality (default: no)
> ...
>   --with-glw-includes=DIRS
>                           GLw include files are in DIRS
>   --with-glw-libs=DIRS    GLw library files are in DIRS
> 
> 
> Is GLw still relevant?

Only for r3.showdspf; it's no longer compiled by default (you need to
explicitly run "make -C raster3d/r3.showdspf" to build it), but it's
still in the source tree.

> If not, let's remove it.

Only if you are also going to remove raster3d/r3.showdspf. There's no
point having the r3.showdspf code in CVS if configure doesn't define
the variables which it requires.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>




More information about the grass-dev mailing list