[GRASS-dev] Re: [bug #5185] shared library problem solaris

[Markus Neteler]

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:29:02PM +0100, Paul Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Markus Neteler wrote:
> 
> >>Sorry to say, but it does not yet work; I do have a suspicion, that the
> >>test in aclocal.m4 on line 1137 is the reason: `uname -s`-`uname -r`
> >>(aclocal.m4 line 446) gives 'SunOS-5.10' on the system I'm using, and
> >>the results do indicate, that contrary to what planned, the system is
> >>treated as on of 5.0 to 5.6.
> >>
> >>Harri K.
> >
> >... new ideas are welcome again...
> 
> Looks like it is treating 5.1.* and 5.10* the same - adding an extra dot
> into the matching expression should fix it I would hope:
> 
> Index: aclocal.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/grass/grassrepository/grass6/aclocal.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.32
> diff -u -r1.32 aclocal.m4
> --- aclocal.m4  12 May 2007 15:03:33 -0000      1.32
> +++ aclocal.m4  14 May 2007 15:24:14 -0000
> @@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@
>             UNSHARED_LIB_SUFFIX='${GRASS_TRIM_DOTS}.a'
>             GRASS_LIB_VERSIONS_OK=nodots
>             ;;
> -       SunOS-5.[[0-6]]*)
> +       SunOS-5.[[0-6]].*)
> 
>             # Note: If _REENTRANT isn't defined, then Solaris
>             # won't define thread-safe library routines.

Thanks, Paul. In CVS now.

Harri, please try again...
Markus