[GRASS-PSC] Re: [GRASS-dev] GRASS 7 Migration from CVS to SVN
hmitaso at unity.ncsu.edu
Sun Oct 14 12:15:38 EDT 2007
There do not seem to be any serious objections to the migration to
neither has anybody requested a vote, so I suggest that Markus starts
on Monday. It is becoming quite urgent due to the changes at ITC-irst
so let us not delay further unless there is a very serious reason
Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
Raleigh NC 27695
On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Helena Mitasova wrote:
> We just had a good discussion about the move of GRASS7 development
> to SVN that quietly died out without any decision. I am guessing that
> there are several of us who are waiting for the move to happen so that
> we can get on with our work. So I would like to ask, please check
> (especially explore the links to
> GDAL SVN/Trac Server, OSGeo-SAC and Peer1)
> speak-up if you have concerns and if there are no objections Markus
> can start the transition of GRASS CVS to OSGeo SVN/Trac, so that we
> can use the same infrastructure as GDAL, OSSIM and other OSGeo
> projects. We can keep the current Mediawiki as user Wiki and use
> Trac as development wiki + PSC.
> Thanks a lot,
> P.S. If anybody feels that this issue needs a PSC vote to make it
> more formal,
> please let Markus know and he can put it up for a vote.
> Helena Mitasova
> Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
> 1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
> Raleigh NC 27695
> On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Helena Mitasova wrote:
>> I agree with what was already said and I think that there are
>> advantages to have all OSGeo projects using the same infrastructure.
>> As others have mentioned - the reliability of Intevation has been
>> outstanding -
>> would the new site be equaly reliable?
>> I have added the info from Frank to the wiki, along with the link
>> (I hope I got it right) in case anybody wants to check it out:
>> It looks as good as it could be, so the last question remains - who
>> is paying for the service and is there a possibility that the cost
>> may become
>> too high for OSGeo (and GRASS) community to handle?
>> Finally - do we need a vote on this for the record?
>> Helena Mitasova
>> Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
>> 1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
>> Raleigh NC 27695
>> On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>> Dear PSC,
>>> we should decide (or give a recommendation to the
>>> developers team) about the migration from CVS to SVN.
>>> This is currently holding the start of GRASS 7 development.
>>> Essentially, all want to migrate to SVN for various
>>> advantages already discussed. But we have to define
>>> where the hosting will take place. Currently there
>>> are two offers:
>>> - SVN with GForge at Intevation in Germany
>>> - SVN with Trac and Wiki at OSGeo.org
>>> With help from Martin Landa I made a Wiki page to
>>> confront both suggestions:
>>> I suggest to discuss this now, add further comments
>>> on the Wiki page where appropriate, decide and
>>> then really do it soon. There is no real reason
>>> to wait any longer.
>>> Please visit the Wiki page and come up with
>>> comments. I cc to the grass-dev list to reach
>>> all interested people.
>>> PS: I'll let through relevant cross-postings which
>>> will be kept by Mailman in case people aren't subscribed
>>> to 'grass-psc'.
>>> ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
>>> ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
>>> grass-dev mailing list
>>> grass-dev at grass.itc.it
>> grass-psc mailing list
>> grass-psc at grass.itc.it
More information about the grass-dev