[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS-user] v.coordinate.sh - improve this script?

[G. Allegri]

I would have asked the same question as Luca. Wouldn't it be more profitable
using QT, as it is already the way Python script are written in QGis? I know
the two projects are independent, but having a common GUI language could
improve the development of scripts in both the environments and the
portability of them.
My impression is that wxWindow is a bit easier to manage then QT, but since
many of us write scripts for QGis too, it would be better to learn well one
system (QT) then two (QT and wxWindow) :-)

Anyway, I'm sure you have good reasons for having chosen wxWindow fro Grass.

Giovanni

2008/1/25, Luca Casagrande <luca.casagrande at gmail.com>:
>
> On Jan 24, 2008 4:28 PM, Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Since the new GUI will be in Python, I strongly suggest that we start
> > developing new scripts in Python and for anyone with time on their
> > hands ;-) start to create Python versions of existing scripts. The
> > more scripts that are available in Python, the more people will make
> > sure that Python is installed and will take a look at it, which will
> > lead to more scripts in Python, etc...
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I have started studying python more deeper for using it in pyWPS and
> for creating new Qgis modules (with QT).
> Just for knowing, is there any reason for using wxWindow instead of Qt
> for the new GUI?
> is it a matter of license?
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Luca
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20080125/d012fa03/attachment.html