[GRASS-dev] proper v.parallel behavior on strange input

[Maris Nartiss]

Hello, Росен!

I think, it's OK for You to do only buffering related stuff and leave
parallel line generation for future. Still I think, correct solution
for buffers is C (see attached example).

Good luck,
Maris.

2008/6/18, Росен Матев <r.matev at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I propose that I cancel development of "clean_parallel()" (the
> function which removes loops), cause its proper behavior is not
> determined now (and it might not be possible to determine it).
> Instead, I'll start making function which generates "type B" lines,
> which will be more useful in buffer generation. What do you think
> about it?
>
> Rosen
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: v.parallel_solution_c.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14534 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20080619/8533cc2f/v.parallel_solution_c-0001.png