[GRASS-dev] New GRASS icons
Martin Landa
landa.martin at gmail.com
Thu Mar 20 07:02:52 EDT 2008
Hi all,
2008/3/20, Michael Barton <michael.barton at asu.edu>:
[snip]
> > I agree with you Michael and I'am still looking for better symbols.
> > Those two first icons will be difficult is we want to express them
> > precisely.
> > Is there significant difference for the user between >display< and
> > >redraw<?
>
>
> There is in TclTk, but I think it is heading toward going away in
> wxPython (opinions Martin??)
'Display' just redraws already rendered layers composition.
'Re-render' renders all layers and creates new layer composition which
is afterwards displayed in the map canvas (e.g. when you zoom, add new
map layer, etc.) BTW you can enable auto-rendering in the statusbar of
map display window. Then content of map canvas is automatically
re-render on every event (adding new layer, changing layer properties,
etc.).
> >
> > Second step for new icons:
> > http://www.szczepanek.pl/icons.grass/index.php#2
> > Please take a look at >layer< and symbols for general actions.
>
>
> Here's my reaction. Basic idea of action icons as modifiers is very
> good.
>
> Add, delete, redraw, more options - great
>
> New - I don't know. But I don't know what a good icon for "new" would
> be. "*" as a modifier may be as good as it gets. "+" on a "folder"?
E.g. "create new workspace", "new raster map", etc.?
> Open, save - make sense. But open folder and disk icons have become
> very widely recognized.
>
> Import, export - look like they mean "forward" and "back". What about
> arrow partly overlapping a folder? Arrowhead pointing towards folder
> and overlapping it (tail extending beyond the folder) for import and
> reverse for export? Something along those lines?
>
> Previous, next - a little hard to see (maybe easier with color), but
> elegant and easy to understand.
>
> Layers: Most GIS people (I think) tend to see maps and layers as
> rectangular so that the edge of the layer lines up with the edge of
> the screen. So the diamond is less easy to understand in the
> abstract. Perhaps color will make it obvious. If so, it is an elegant
> design. I'd go with the left one over the right one.
>
> I really appreciate you doing this and that you are doing it with
> such careful thought as to usability and attractive design.
>
Good starting point for nice GRASS-original icons... Good work:-)
Martin
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list