[GRASS-dev] Re: big region r.watershed

[Glynn Clements]

Markus Metz wrote:

> Right now I don't want to introduce a new option to give the user
> control over how much memory is used (be it MB memory, number of rows or
> percent of the map) because I want to keep all options of
> r.watershed.fast identical to the original version.

There's no reason to avoid adding new options, so long as you don't
remove or modify existing options, and choose reasonable default
behaviour in the case where the new option isn't used.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>