[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #73: r.out.gdal tiff output does
not work
Moritz Lennert
mlennert at club.worldonline.be
Fri Oct 24 09:32:53 EDT 2008
On 24/10/08 14:10, Markus Metz wrote:
>
> GRASS GIS wrote:
>> #73: r.out.gdal tiff output does not work
>> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>> Reporter: helena | Owner: grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> Type: defect | Status: new
>> Priority: critical | Milestone: 6.4.0
>> Component: Raster | Version: svn-trunk
>> Resolution: | Keywords: r.out.gdal, tiff
>> Platform: Unspecified | Cpu: Unspecified
>> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>> Comment (by neteler):
>>
>> Markus (Metz),
>>
>> what about integrating your fixes from
>> http://markus.metz.giswork.googlepages.com/r.out.gdal.conservative.tar.gz
>> ?
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
> Sure, no objections from my side, I'm using this version only. But
> r.out.gdal is a very important module of GRASS and maybe some more
> testing is required. Also, the new features may not find approval by
> all, e.g. I've put in rather restrictive NULL cell handling: the user
> has to specify a nodata value that falls within the range of the
> selected datatype (Byte, UInt16, Int16, ...), a nodata value is no
> longer chosen automatically as in the original version. If a nodata
> value is not given, but NULL cells are present, r.out.gdal aborts with
> an error message. My version also no longer uses the current region
> resolution, instead the current region extends are aligned to the
> resolution of the raster to be exported to avoid any implicit
> resampling. And the colortable is only exported on request, and then
> with a warning message.
> If these changes are ok with you then integrate the changes, otherwise
> maybe only some, but not all changes could be integrated. More
> discussion needed on how to change/improve r.out.gdal?
+1 for all of these changes. Let's try with those and then discuss.
Moritz
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list