[GRASS-dev] v.buffer

Hamish hamish_b at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 23 07:36:33 EDT 2009


> > This is bad.
....
> I think that the second option would be better. Users might

[will]

> have scripts which use the old syntax. Aren't we supposed to be more
> or less backwards compatible within a major version?

yes

> However distance is a more "proper" name for the parameter IMHO.
> So keep it as distance in 7 maybe?

in devbr6 and relbr6_4 I have added backwards compatibility aliases for
the removed options. so all should be ok again.


Hamish




      



More information about the grass-dev mailing list