[GRASS-dev] v.buffer
Hamish
hamish_b at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 23 07:36:33 EDT 2009
> > This is bad.
....
> I think that the second option would be better. Users might
[will]
> have scripts which use the old syntax. Aren't we supposed to be more
> or less backwards compatible within a major version?
yes
> However distance is a more "proper" name for the parameter IMHO.
> So keep it as distance in 7 maybe?
in devbr6 and relbr6_4 I have added backwards compatibility aliases for
the removed options. so all should be ok again.
Hamish
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list