[GRASS-dev] Re: grass-dev Digest, Vol 35, Issue 44

Glynn Clements glynn at gclements.plus.com
Fri Mar 13 15:59:53 EDT 2009

Michael Barton wrote:

> A somewhat more pragmatic issue prompted my initial question. Right  
> now, we have both r.mfilter AND r.mfilter.fp in distribution copies of  
> GRASS. r.mfilter is in the menu but r.mfilter.fp is not. Both have  
> identical documentation. I am reluctant to put 2 apparently identical  
> r.mfilter entries into the menu, and having 2 of these without saying  
> what the difference is will be confusing to users. But if r.mfilter.fp  
> is better, it should arguably be the one that most users access. So I  
> was thinking about replacing the entry for r.mfilter with  
> r.mfilter.fp. But it seems better to just have a single more  
> functional version of this module.

For the GUI, I would suggest using just r.mfilter.fp.

The old r.mfilter should be retained in 6.x in case anyone has scripts
which depend upon it.

Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list