[GRASS-dev] Re: grass-dev Digest, Vol 35, Issue 44

Michael Barton michael.barton at asu.edu
Fri Mar 13 19:22:09 EDT 2009

On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Glynn Clements wrote:

> Michael Barton wrote:
>> A somewhat more pragmatic issue prompted my initial question. Right
>> now, we have both r.mfilter AND r.mfilter.fp in distribution copies  
>> of
>> GRASS. r.mfilter is in the menu but r.mfilter.fp is not. Both have
>> identical documentation. I am reluctant to put 2 apparently identical
>> r.mfilter entries into the menu, and having 2 of these without saying
>> what the difference is will be confusing to users. But if  
>> r.mfilter.fp
>> is better, it should arguably be the one that most users access. So I
>> was thinking about replacing the entry for r.mfilter with
>> r.mfilter.fp. But it seems better to just have a single more
>> functional version of this module.
> For the GUI, I would suggest using just r.mfilter.fp.

Done in all branches (6.4, 6.5, 7)


> The old r.mfilter should be retained in 6.x in case anyone has scripts
> which depend upon it.
> -- 
> Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>

More information about the grass-dev mailing list