[GRASS-dev] adding 2 more modules to G7 SVNimagery

[Soeren Gebbert]

Hello Yann,
while adding new i.eb.* modules it would be great if you can check
this ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/899
Maybe it is obsolete now?

Best regards
Soeren

2011/1/23 Yann Chemin <yann.chemin at gmail.com>:
> Yes theoretically same for i.eb.* modules. Practically, it will be
> some work and maybe creating maintenance trouble.
>
> When I was thinking about i.eb.toolbox two issues were there first:
> 1-Coding blocks from each module to be kept separated somehow for
> maintenance/bug fixing reasons
> 2-possibility to have a module tab dedicated to each type of tool,
> with the possibility of input parameters to appear in two or more
> tabs.
>
> Rest is sweat and debugging and unforeseen problems
>
> I would appreciate comments from experienced coders about integrating
> many tools in one.
>
> Yann
>
> Yann Chemin
> www.csu.edu.au
>
> On 23/01/2011, at 21:05, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yann,
>>
>> On 1/23/11, Yann Chemin <yann.chemin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to complete the i.evapo.* series of modules from
>>> grass-addons/imagery/gipe with these two last ones.
>>> i.evapo.potrad: potential radiation (Bastiaanssen, 1995)
>>> i.evapo.senay: Actual evapotranspiration (Senay, 2007)
>>
>> would it be possible to make one single i.evapo module
>> and manage the methods via method=xx parameter?
>>
>> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>