[GRASS-dev] GRASS SoC ideas wiki
Markus Neteler
neteler at osgeo.org
Sun Mar 27 03:43:57 EDT 2011
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Hamish <hamish_b at yahoo.com> wrote:
...
> - "Design GRASS toolboxes environment, see GRASS repository layout proposal
> for detailed information. This would also include general clean up and
> organization of existing GRASS modules in trunk and add-ons."
> -> We can't dump a student into such a contentious area without coming
> to some consensus on the design ourselves first. Personally I consider
> the breaking up of GRASS's 400 modules into a series of optional
> toolboxes to be a massive mistake.
Why?
> GEM already exists, but no one wants to use it,
.. because it is overkill (since some lines of script to almost the same).
> g.extention is at its core fundamentally a hack (I say as a
> coauthor), etc.--there's still a lot of maturing of ideas to do. The
> wiki addons page is getting rather long, but we aren't on the scale of
> needing something like CRAN yet..
For sure the *easy* integration of extra functionality is wanted by many
users. For sure also the possibility to "just" have the hydro part (or
whatever) of GRASS with a few clicks which would then also (ideally)
provide a GUI with only these modules in it.
I find that idea quite good.
> - "Design sophisticated Python scripting interface for GRASS". -> I don't
> get it. What is it? What would it do which python + grass.py doesn't
> already?
Maybe you can but it is neither sufficiently documented (see all the related
questions) nor sufficiently structured/complete to be a Python API to GRASS
or whatever you want to call it.
Markus
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list