[GRASS-dev] Re: graphical modeler results

[Michael Barton]

Thanks for the enhancements. I'll test. Are these backported to all versions or just in 6.5 for now?

Michael
____________________
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity 
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Arizona State University

voice: 	480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC)
fax:          480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu











On Sep 6, 2011, at 3:21 AM, Martin Landa wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 2011/9/3 Michael Barton <Michael.Barton at asu.edu>:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Input from an existing map shows up a oval with arrow to command module. But
>> module taking output from another module doesn't show any graphical
>> connection. There is no way to draw a graphical connection from one
>> component of a model another component.
> 
> The first module produces output (data), so
> 
> module (action) ->data (eg. raster map) -> module (action)
> 
>> AFAICT, at the button with the mouseover text of "define relation between
>> data and action items" does nothing graphical. It works sporadically, and
>> when it does, it seems to generate data ovals and connect them to the
>> command boxes. But these must be defined in the command item/grass module
>> AFAICT.
> 
> It should add connection between items (line with arrow). At the
> beginning the modeler has not been design to define relations
> manually, they should be updated based on action parameters you enter.
> Speaking about manual definition of relation you can expect some bugs,
> please report them on trac (with reproducible examples).
> 
> Martin
> 
> -- 
> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa