[GRASS-dev] grass toolboxes idea continued (g.extension)
maris.gis at gmail.com
Tue Jan 3 02:31:27 EST 2012
I'm not in the mood to digg deeply into this concept. It looks similar
to R packages, right? Can we borrow most of (design) from R to not
reinvent the wheel and to learn from their mistakes/success?
Also, if we have an option to start a new, why limit ourselves to
single or double letter as toolbox prefix? I assume, all modules in a
toolbox should have a common prefix, like hy.flow, right?
Just drinking morning tea,
2012/1/2 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
> I have added (r50024) very initial support of "toolboxes idea" (see
>  for detailed information) to `g.extension` (see notes at wiki
> ). Any feedback, support, improvements welcomed.
>  http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/Toolboxes
>  http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/Toolboxes#Managing_toolboxes
> Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the grass-dev