[GRASS-dev] could r.stream.* become part of GRASS core?

[Moritz Lennert]

On 16/11/12 09:10, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 15/11/12 23:41, Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>>> I agree that the quality of the r.stream.* modules is out of question.
>>
>> these are very nice and useful modules with high quality.
>>
>>> For what concerns including it into the core, I would like to point you out the discussion
>>> [1] about the concept of toolboxes. The general orientation is not to include field specific
>>> groups of modules into the core and make them available in an easy way when required.

Please also note the discussion in this thread [1], where most 
developpers rather seem to plead for integrating more modules directly 
into trunk.

Toolboxes would then rather be menu blocks that you can activate or not, 
organising your GUI access to the relevant modules.

Moritz

[1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2012-October/060565.html