[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r63797 - in grass/trunk: display/d.barscale display/d.colortable display/d.erase display/d.geodesic display/d.grid display/d.histogram display/d.legend display/d.mon display/d.northarrow display/d.rast display/d.rast.arrow display/d.rast.num display/d.rhumbline display/d.thematic.area display/d.vect display/d.vect.chart general/g.cairocomp general/g.parser general/g.pnmcomp include lib/gis misc/m.nviz.image raster/r.his vector/v.label vector/v.lrs/v.lrs.label

[Anna Petrášová]

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> 2014-12-29 12:26 GMT+01:00 Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>:
> >> it would be nice to solve it before RC1. Any objections?
>

I think it's not necessary, it doesn't help with anything, everybody will
keep using bgcolor anyway. We already have similar cases (pcurvature,
nwalkers) which where already changed and we don't plan to add another
underscore there.

Anna

>
> > Not an objection as such, but FWIW I'd still prefer a solution which
> > allows background_color=, as well as bg_color=.
>
> what does it mean exactly? back_ground_color or ?
>
> Martin
>
> --
> Martin Landa
> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20141229/bfc656cd/attachment.html>