[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2024: r.li.setup generates incomplete r.li conf file

[GRASS GIS]

#2024: r.li.setup generates incomplete r.li conf file
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  matmar      |       Owner:  rashadkm           
     Type:  defect      |      Status:  assigned           
 Priority:  normal      |   Milestone:  6.4.4              
Component:  Raster      |     Version:  svn-releasebranch64
 Keywords:  r.li.setup  |    Platform:  Linux              
      Cpu:  x86-64      |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------

Comment(by rashadkm):

 Replying to [comment:15 wenzeslaus]:

 I agree tcl/tk is replaced by wxgui. But in this case only working
 solution to generate a conf file is using grass64 r.li.setup script. The
 new addition to tcltk could also be added in g.gui.rlisetup. As the work
 is not finished there, I thought to add this modification in grass65
 (devel branch). Also r.li.setup with x mon was fast to render large raster
 data which i was used in testing and rendering large maps on wxgui is
 still slow. Think of 100 sample region drawn on a 365MB data. Each time wx
 monitor will redraw the map (which it must be) and user zoom to an
 sampling region. So modification to trunk is the correct way but in this
 case no options.

 > Replying to [comment:14 rashadkm]:
 > > Hi Hamish,
 > >
 > > I think its better to use grass devbranch rather than grass70.
 ofcourse i can provide a corresponding patch for it simultaneously. The
 reason is r.li.setup tcl is lacking in grass70 and it would be better to
 test for others also if there is everything working. what do you think?
 >
 > Providing patches simultaneously for develbrach 6 and trunk is better,
 in my opinion. If you just patch develbrach 6, the changes must be forward
 ported one day and it might be much harder to do it (for you or somebody
 else) just because of loosing track what is in code.
 >
 > > g.gui.rlisetup is still in a state with missing functionality. I had
 some patches for it and sent to Luca for reviewing it and he will be
 updating g.gui.rlisetup in vienna code sprint (putting up missing parts).
 >
 > !Tck/Tk will be dropped, so all the work done in it will be lost, thus
 it is much better to focus on improving `g.gui.rlisetup` (rather than
 improving !Tck/Tk setup).

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2024#comment:17>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>