[GRASS-dev] Addons to Ohloh

[Luca Delucchi]

On 31 March 2014 01:08, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>

Hi

> do you think that GRASS GIS Addons [1] should go to Ohloh [2]? I do, because
> they are part of the project and should be tracked.
>

+1

> GRASS GIS Addons can be added as additional repository for GRASS GIS project
> or they can be a separated project at Ohloh. Some projects went this way of
> having plugins/extension/addons separated. The reasons for this might be
> that the developers group, used languages or contribution frequency can be
> really different. What do you think? Or do you know some other ways on
> Ohloh? (I don't know much about Ohloh.)
>

I'd like to see it separated from the main code

> The question also is if grass-addons/ or grass-addons/grass7 or something
> else should be used. I vote for grass-addons, although there is some
> duplication. But there are some distinct things and it follows the idea of
> having there 64 and trunk. But I don't have a strong opinion on this either.
>

I also vote for grass-addons

> Vaclav
>
>
> [1] http://svn.osgeo.org/grass/grass-addons/
> [2] https://www.ohloh.net
>
>
> PS: I was considering for a second if to add also 70 branch besides trunk
> and the answer is clearly no. This would be definitively a huge duplication
> (and thus nonsense for Ohloh).
>

+1, also because most of the code should pass from trunk....

-- 
ciao
Luca

http://gis.cri.fmach.it/delucchi/
www.lucadelu.org