[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r60422 - grass/trunk/lib/gis

[Huidae Cho]

Hi,

I was syncing with G_OPT_C_FG, which has "standard color name". I don't
have a strong opinion against "standard GRASS color name" as long as
G_OPT_C_FG and G_OPT_C_BG have the same wording, but I'm not so sure if we
really need to say "GRASS" when we're using GRASS. For example, even
"mapset/region" should be "GRASS mapset/region" then? No other standard
options had "GRASS" other than G_OPT_C_BG. Why do you think this case can
be more confusing than other GRASS specific words? Just wondering.

Huidae


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, <svn_grass at osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> -           _("Either a standard GRASS color, R:G:B triplet, or
>> \"none\"");
>> +           _("Either a standard color name, R:G:B triplet, or \"none\"");
>>
>
> I definitively agree with adding "name" there. However, I'm not so sure
> about leaving "GRASS" out because it is not clear what is "standard color
> name". Which standard? DVI, SVG, CSS? Even leaving out "standard" would
> make sense since "GRASS color name" is enough, I would say.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140523/b0911692/attachment.html>