[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r60422 - grass/trunk/lib/gis

[Vaclav Petras]

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Huidae Cho <grass4u at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was syncing with G_OPT_C_FG, which has "standard color name". I don't
> have a strong opinion against "standard GRASS color name" as long as
> G_OPT_C_FG and G_OPT_C_BG have the same wording, but I'm not so sure if we
> really need to say "GRASS" when we're using GRASS. For example, even
> "mapset/region" should be "GRASS mapset/region" then? No other standard
> options had "GRASS" other than G_OPT_C_BG. Why do you think this case can
> be more confusing than other GRASS specific words? Just wondering.
>
> OK, this sounds reasonable. I was considering that the modules accepting
aspect or direction usually speak about "grass" convention or something
like this. Although in case of r.ros, I might be the one who added it there.

http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/display/d.rast.arrow/main.c#L105
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.ros/main.c#L303


> Huidae
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, <svn_grass at osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>>> -           _("Either a standard GRASS color, R:G:B triplet, or
>>> \"none\"");
>>> +           _("Either a standard color name, R:G:B triplet, or
>>> \"none\"");
>>>
>>
>> I definitively agree with adding "name" there. However, I'm not so sure
>> about leaving "GRASS" out because it is not clear what is "standard color
>> name". Which standard? DVI, SVG, CSS? Even leaving out "standard" would
>> make sense since "GRASS color name" is enough, I would say.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140523/34f59cf0/attachment.html>