[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r60422 - grass/trunk/lib/gis

Huidae Cho grass4u at gmail.com
Fri May 23 08:02:39 PDT 2014


In case of aspect or direction, there are different coding schemes in
different formats, but color names are more generic even though there are
only 16 standard colors. BTW, I doubt there is a way for the user to see
all these standard color names and R:G:B triplet pairs.


On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Huidae Cho <grass4u at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was syncing with G_OPT_C_FG, which has "standard color name". I don't
>> have a strong opinion against "standard GRASS color name" as long as
>> G_OPT_C_FG and G_OPT_C_BG have the same wording, but I'm not so sure if we
>> really need to say "GRASS" when we're using GRASS. For example, even
>> "mapset/region" should be "GRASS mapset/region" then? No other standard
>> options had "GRASS" other than G_OPT_C_BG. Why do you think this case can
>> be more confusing than other GRASS specific words? Just wondering.
>>
>> OK, this sounds reasonable. I was considering that the modules accepting
> aspect or direction usually speak about "grass" convention or something
> like this. Although in case of r.ros, I might be the one who added it there.
>
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/display/d.rast.arrow/main.c#L105
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.ros/main.c#L303
>
>
>> Huidae
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, <svn_grass at osgeo.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -           _("Either a standard GRASS color, R:G:B triplet, or
>>>> \"none\"");
>>>> +           _("Either a standard color name, R:G:B triplet, or
>>>> \"none\"");
>>>>
>>>
>>> I definitively agree with adding "name" there. However, I'm not so sure
>>> about leaving "GRASS" out because it is not clear what is "standard color
>>> name". Which standard? DVI, SVG, CSS? Even leaving out "standard" would
>>> make sense since "GRASS color name" is enough, I would say.
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20140523/393c989a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list