[GRASS-dev] Backport r.li memory allocation fixes?
wenzeslaus at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 09:05:39 PDT 2014
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>
> >> Hi Markus and others,
> >> I would do a backport or r61812 but I'm not sure if it works correctly.
> >> seems to work and I got the same results as with the old version but I
> >> remember that you (Markus) had some doubts at one point. Now I actually
> >> that you said you will backport it, so if you have your plan disregard
> >> message.
> > Please backport it.
> ... after removing the C++ style comment in raster/r.li/r.li.daemon/avl.c.
> Done. It was double wrong, it was just the old code which I forgot to
Anyway, I'm not sure if there is some reason not to use C++ comments since
we mostly relay on POSIX capable compiler (which will probably handle //,
just a guess).
> Markus M
> > It should probably also go into G6 which is almost
> > identical.
> >> I also wanted to use the things bellow to write a test but I don't know
> > Would this script give some ideas?
> > raster/r.li/r.li.testing_nc_asc.sh
> > Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
> > grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the grass-dev