[GRASS-dev] r.stats output
Moritz Lennert
mlennert at club.worldonline.be
Wed Sep 24 05:43:08 PDT 2014
On 24/09/14 14:08, Paulo van Breugel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Moritz Lennert
> It thus does not make sense to provide coordinates for count or
> area: which coordinates would you use if you have cells with the
> same category all over your map ?
>
>
> It makes sense if each raster cell is assigned an unique category (which
> I did). What I was trying was get the area per raster cell (of a latlon
> raster). But yes, it makes sense that in in general it wouldn't be
> logical to have coordinates and area at the same time. I was too much
> focussed on my very specific case (trying an alternative way to get
> raster cell size of latlon grid).
Ok, now I understand your problem, but honestly, in such a situation I
believe that it is better to chose a relevant projection, reproject the
grid and then just use resolution^2 as cell size...
But since you already have gone down the route of calculating cell size
in r.mapcalc, I guess you really wanted to do it in latlon... ;-)
Moritz
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list