[GRASS-dev] r.slope.aspect: one pixel less in the output at the border shrinks region extent in further calculations
hellik at web.de
Sun Jan 4 10:53:15 PST 2015
> I believe that any reasonable estimate is better than the current
> shrinking region (in r.flow we just
> propagate the same values to the edges), but that does not seem to be the
I agree with you that a reasonable estimate is better than the current
I've opened an enhancement ticket for this
> you can use r.resamp.rst which computes slope and aspect and does not
> shrink the region. But you may
> need to adjust the parameters to make sure it works well.
> (you can compute the edge values e.g.in r.mapcalc).
I'll have a look r.resamp.rst and r.mapcalc in the meantime.
> I am quite interested in the flat valley bottoms.
the authors  introduced a quite complex procedure to calculate an index
of valley bottom flatness, but it seems to be used especially in soil
science papers. I've used it a little bit for riverine landscape analysis.
in r.valley.bottom  DEM coarsening and smoothing as suggested by Gallant
& Dowling seems to work already; although a lot of code tweaking (especially
to choose/calculate thresholds independently of base DEM resolution, ...) is
testing and input is welcome.
"John C. Gallant and Trevor I. Dowling
A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 39, NO. 12, 1347, doi:10.1029/2002WR001426,
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/r-slope-aspect-one-pixel-less-in-the-output-at-the-border-shrinks-region-extent-in-further-calculatis-tp5179874p5179937.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the grass-dev