[GRASS-dev] [GRASS GIS] #2208: r.in.gdal/v.in.ogr: reprojection at import
GRASS GIS
trac at osgeo.org
Fri Jan 30 13:01:30 PST 2015
#2208: r.in.gdal/v.in.ogr: reprojection at import
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: mlennert | Owner: grass-dev@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: Default | Version: unspecified
Keywords: projection import gdal ogr | Platform: Unspecified
Cpu: Unspecified |
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment(by mmetz):
Replying to [comment:16 martinl]:
> Replying to [comment:7 annakrat]:
>
> > Thanks, that's great! Eventually, this should be a core module and
should be incorporated in the import dialog. Although the gui should be
simple, we can still force users to actively decide the method and
resolution.
>
> I absolutely agree, are you planning to do that? Thanks, Martin
There is a GUI-related issue. The two modules currently have each two
input options, input_file and input_directory. It would be nice if these
two options could be combined in one, key input, type string, and the GUI
would provide an interface similar to r.in.gdal/v.in.ogr where you can
select if you want to import a file or a directory or something from a
database. The difference to the current r.in.gdal/v.in.ogr interface would
be that input is only one GDAL/OGR datasource. Each GDAL/OGR datasource
may contain several band/layers, but that is handled by
r.in.gdal/v.in.ogr. GDAL supports currently 135 different formats, OGR 80
different formats. Not all of them are file based, thus the need for
flexible specification of the input datasource.
The aim is to provide a simple yet powerful interface for users to import
data which are (semi-)automatically reprojected if need be.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/2208#comment:17>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list