[GRASS-dev] v.rast.stats disables MASK

[Newcomb, Doug]

+1 Agree.  I've run into this before

Doug

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Maris Nartiss <maris.gis at gmail.com> wrote:

> This definitely needs a flag + explanation in documentation.
>
> Taking into account philosophy behind GRASS raster processing, I would
> say - default should be to apply MASK, as MASK affects all raster
> reading operations (unless stated otherwise or requested by user).
>
> Maris.
>
>
> 2015-10-06 19:15 GMT+03:00 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
> > 2015-10-06 18:13 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be
> >:
> >> But this was a bug that you fixed in r66421, or ?
> >
> > yes, it was. I was just wondering why the module should ignore the
> > mask. It was answered. Martin
> >
> > --
> > Martin Landa
> > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> > http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
> > grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>



-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
As a federal employee, my email may be subject to FOIA request.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20151007/46c63963/attachment.html>