[GRASS-dev] v.rast.stats disables MASK

[Anna Petrášová]

Hi,

sorry I jumped so late into this discussion, but I think we can just remove
any mask related code in v.rast.stats - it's apparently leftover from
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/44444/

It used mask in the past, but now it uses r.univar zones instead.

Anna

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Newcomb, Doug <doug_newcomb at fws.gov> wrote:

> +1 Agree.  I've run into this before
>
> Doug
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Maris Nartiss <maris.gis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This definitely needs a flag + explanation in documentation.
>>
>> Taking into account philosophy behind GRASS raster processing, I would
>> say - default should be to apply MASK, as MASK affects all raster
>> reading operations (unless stated otherwise or requested by user).
>>
>> Maris.
>>
>>
>> 2015-10-06 19:15 GMT+03:00 Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>:
>> > 2015-10-06 18:13 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be
>> >:
>> >> But this was a bug that you fixed in r66421, or ?
>> >
>> > yes, it was. I was just wondering why the module should ignore the
>> > mask. It was answered. Martin
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martin Landa
>> > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
>> > http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > grass-dev mailing list
>> > grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-dev mailing list
>> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Doug Newcomb
> USFWS
> Raleigh, NC
> 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
> official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
> Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
> As a federal employee, my email may be subject to FOIA request.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20151007/50440471/attachment-0001.html>