[GRASS-dev] is it time to release GRASS71?

Newcomb, Doug doug_newcomb at fws.gov
Thu Feb 25 12:36:31 PST 2016


+1

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

>
> On Feb 25, 2016 5:05 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> this system is used also by QGIS, MapServer, moreover it's part of
> >> GRASS history (with one exception - 6.3). I have no strong option
> >> about that. I would say let's follow our tradition to use odd numbers
> >> for dev versions. Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > The fact that other OSGeo projects are using it is quite convincing. But
> anyway, I don't see a point in simply skipping a version number.
>
> Well, we are using 7.1 visibly for so long as unstable/dev version.
> So it sounds perfectly fine to call the result 7.2.
>
> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>



-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
As a federal employee, my email may be subject to FOIA request.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20160225/c56411e3/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list