[GRASS-dev] Testing i.superpixels.slic

Markus Metz markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com
Fri Mar 3 12:27:30 PST 2017


I have updated the manual of i.superpixels.slic in r70724, explaining why
the GRASS implementation does not provide results identical to the original
implementation. Please review!

Markus M

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be
> wrote:

> On 02/03/17 12:09, Sophie Crommelinck wrote:
>
>> Hi Moritz,
>>
>> thank you for your extensive answer! Your reply was very clear and
>> solved most of my questions, I added two comments in your mail below.
>>
>> @ Vaclav Petras: You asked to provide the data as well. I uploaded the
>> part of the orthoimage shown in the screenshots to the same folder:
>> https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW
>> <https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW>
>>
>
> After import I get ortho.red, ortho.green, ortho.blue.
>
> Using
>
> i.group ortho.red in=ortho.red
> i.superpixels.slic ortho.red out=red_sup iterations=50 step=15 perturb=50
> compactness=3 memory=5000
>
> I get the following result in 1m40s:
>
> http://tomahawk.ulb.ac.be/moritz/superpixels_ortho_red.png
>
> Not so bad, I would say ;-)
>
>
> Moritz
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20170303/6ec6d944/attachment.html>


More information about the grass-dev mailing list