[GRASS-dev] Testing i.superpixels.slic

[Sophie Crommelinck]

Hello,

@ Moritz: Thanks for the support, I will continue testing the module with
further data.
@ Markus: I think the manual is clearer now.

Best,

Sophie


2017-03-03 21:27 GMT+01:00 Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com>:

> I have updated the manual of i.superpixels.slic in r70724, explaining why
> the GRASS implementation does not provide results identical to the original
> implementation. Please review!
>
> Markus M
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Moritz Lennert <
> mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>
>> On 02/03/17 12:09, Sophie Crommelinck wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Moritz,
>>>
>>> thank you for your extensive answer! Your reply was very clear and
>>> solved most of my questions, I added two comments in your mail below.
>>>
>>> @ Vaclav Petras: You asked to provide the data as well. I uploaded the
>>> part of the orthoimage shown in the screenshots to the same folder:
>>> https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW
>>> <https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW>
>>>
>>
>> After import I get ortho.red, ortho.green, ortho.blue.
>>
>> Using
>>
>> i.group ortho.red in=ortho.red
>> i.superpixels.slic ortho.red out=red_sup iterations=50 step=15 perturb=50
>> compactness=3 memory=5000
>>
>> I get the following result in 1m40s:
>>
>> http://tomahawk.ulb.ac.be/moritz/superpixels_ortho_red.png
>>
>> Not so bad, I would say ;-)
>>
>>
>> Moritz
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-dev mailing list
>> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20170308/d2094b92/attachment.html>