[GRASS-dev] [GRASS-SVN] r73360 - grass/branches/releasebranch_7_6/scripts/r.import

[Moritz Lennert]

Markus,

Could you explain this ? Does this mean that the memory parameter in 
r.in.gdal is now automagic ? Or why doesn't it make sens to let the user 
define in r.import the memory size ?

Moritz

On 17/09/18 15:30, svn_grass at osgeo.org wrote:
> Author: neteler
> Date: 2018-09-17 06:30:25 -0700 (Mon, 17 Sep 2018)
> New Revision: 73360
> 
> Modified:
>     grass/branches/releasebranch_7_6/scripts/r.import/r.import.py
> Log:
> r.import: remove hardcoded memory limit (r.in.gdal will take care)
> 
> Modified: grass/branches/releasebranch_7_6/scripts/r.import/r.import.py
> ===================================================================
> --- grass/branches/releasebranch_7_6/scripts/r.import/r.import.py	2018-09-17 13:29:35 UTC (rev 73359)
> +++ grass/branches/releasebranch_7_6/scripts/r.import/r.import.py	2018-09-17 13:30:25 UTC (rev 73360)
> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
>   #% type: integer
>   #% required: no
>   #% multiple: no
> -#% options: 0-2047
>   #% label: Maximum memory to be used (in MB)
>   #% description: Cache size for raster rows
>   #% answer: 300
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-commit mailing list
> grass-commit at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-commit
>