[GRASS-PSC] adding r.li to GRASS

[Hamish]

Scott Mitchell wrote:
> 
> I'd be very happy to see r.li added.  I think there is general  
> utility to this - I get asked about the state of "LE" modules in  
> GRASS fairly regularly - there are lots of landscape ecology grad  
> students around here, and William Baker's programs are generally if  
> only vaguely familiar to them -- even before being exposed to me here 
> at Carleton, many of the grad students coming into our labs have  
> heard of GRASS because of the old r.le.  I also know of groups at my  
> former workplace that still do most of their work in grass5 due to a  
> combination of continuing reliance on the old sites capabilities, and 
> wanting to use r.le - the sites stuff is pretty much possible in  
> grass6 now so it's just r.le holding them back.

Due to recent fixes, the r.le modules should be fully functional in
GRASS 6.2.0 and 6.3-cvs.


> Between Paolo's group's work and William Baker looking at this again, 
> it's great to see so much renewed activity.
> 
> I can take some responsibility for commits, if that's what it takes.
> I'll try out the current version today on my own system.

That's great.


Hamish