Dylan Beaudette debeaudette at ucdavis.edu
Mon Oct 30 14:42:17 EST 2006

On Sunday 29 October 2006 01:51, Hamish wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote:
> > The general question is: dedicated list or not. It seems that we have
> > contrary opinions at the moment.
> I'm for a dedicated list, with open subscription (including posting) and
> archives, anyone can participate or not as they wish. I think by the
> notable exceptions to the PSC it can be inferred that there are people
> who are interested in the technical emails but not the governance
> emails.
> All distilled "call for votes" should/must be cross-posted to the
> grass-dev list*, but we shouldn't subject people who are only interested
> in technical coding to page long governance speeches :)
> [*] actual votes go to the grass-psc list...
> If a separate psc list proves to be redundant, it can be merged back
> into grass-dev; if folks on grass-dev are upset about finding out about
> things after-the-fact, they can subscribe to the grass-psc list.
> (shrug- I think it mostly boils down to email filters: highlight PSC
> threads when there are 200 messages in an inbox, filter out PSC noise
> for those who don't want it)
> Hamish

Having a separate list is ok with me, with votes being cross-posted to the dev 

Dylan Beaudette
Soils and Biogeochemistry Graduate Group
University of California at Davis

More information about the grass-psc mailing list