[GRASS-PSC] RFC1 vote reminder

[Markus Neteler]

On 3/21/07, Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at unity.ncsu.edu> wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Paul Kelly wrote:
...
> > I see where you're coming from with that and definitely think in
> > the future it will be a really clear unambiguous way of specifying
> > it - and good for GRASS - but right now I feel it might be a kind
> > of chicken and egg situation - we have to have this document
> > correct and the PSC properly in place for GRASS to be accepted as
> > an OSGeo project, so it just doesn't seem right to include that in
> > there now. I'm not sure - if I as I was saying earlier we could
> > update the PSC later to change things like this then that could be
> > done, but now I am coming round more to Scott's viewpoint that the
> > GRASS project paragraph should just describe unambiguously at this
> > moment in time which project is being governed by the PSC and
> > brought into OSGeo.
> >
> > Good idea though - my mind still confused over the issue.
>
> you are right - it would be good for this vote to include what is
> GRASS right now (then I would say -
> Markus let us know what do you think would be best to use -
> Intevation CVS link or your foundation or both?)

I would say both because GRASS is source code + community + Web
and the latter are basically hosted at FBK-irst (formerly known as ITC-irst).

Markus

> After we become official OSGeo project we can develop a more long
> term definition - maybe OSGeo will have some guidance
> that will be useful for all projects.
>
> Helena