[GRASS-PSC] RFC3: New voting rules

[Yann Chemin]

I second Helena on quorum (min 51%), and also +1 for the 7 days suggestion
of MaDi.


On 7 April 2014 06:19, Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at ncsu.edu> wrote:

> I agree with the voting rules with the following changes/comments:
>
> - change 4 business days to seven days to avoid confusion given that
> business days may be different in different countries due to holidays (as
> already suggested)
> - I am confused about #6 - does this mean that it is enough for 2 PSC
> members (out of 10?) to agree to accept a proposal?
> Should we have at least a simple majority? Does this voting procedure
> apply to svn access as well?
>
> Helena
>
> Helena Mitasova
> Associate Professor
> Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
> 2800 Faucette Drive, Rm. 1125 Jordan Hall
> North Carolina State University
> Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
> hmitaso at ncsu.edu
>
> "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are
> sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records
> Law and may be disclosed to third parties.”
>
> On Apr 6, 2014, at 6:48 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
> > PSC;
> >
> > since the voting discussion is scattered around in various email
> > threads, I start a new one to separate it from ongoing motions. Please
> > re-express your comments as answer to this email.
> >
> >  RFC3: PSC Voting Procedures
> >  http://grass.osgeo.org/programming7/rfc3_psc.html
> >
> >
> > Issues:
> > - people are travelling and periodically offline
> > - not all members may need to vote (majority, quorum, etc)
> > - keep it simple
> > - ...
> >
> > Best,
> > Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-psc mailing list
> > grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>



-- 
----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20140407/a5e13f59/attachment.html>