[GRASS-PSC] git migration

[Veronica Andreo]

Hi,

I opened a thread for discussion about labels and priorities for issues in
the RFC, but there was not so much interest apparently [1]. I still believe
that we should keep
raster(3d), vector, temporal and so on as components. I think those are
useful and make search easier. Modules is maybe too general, IMO.

my 0.2 cents
Vero

[1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2019-March/091584.html


El mar., 26 mar. 2019 a las 21:06, Martin Landa (<landa.martin at gmail.com>)
escribió:

> Hi,
>
> út 26. 3. 2019 v 11:28 odesílatel Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>
> napsal:
> > where do we stand here at time?
>
> RFC document is OK for me. I am ready to vote about that. Ma
>
> --
> Martin Landa
> http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20190326/efc275ed/attachment.html>