[GRASS-PSC] [Motion] Adopt new logo and branding

Paulo van Breugel p.vanbreugel at gmail.com
Thu Mar 27 12:31:58 PDT 2025


Great +1

On March 27, 2025 12:35:05 PM GMT+01:00, "Linda Karlovská via grass-psc" <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>I like it very much! The logo is simple and impactful, especially the
>gradient version looks really nice.
>
>+1
>
>Linda
>
>
>
>---------- Původní e-mail ----------
>Od: Vaclav Petras via grass-psc <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>Komu: GRASS-PSC <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>Datum: 25. 3. 2025 23:21:52
>Předmět: [GRASS-PSC] [Motion] Adopt new logo and branding
>"
>
>
>Dear GRASS PSC Members,
>
>
>
>
>As discussed in the 2025-02-14 meeting, our team at NC State University—led
>by myself, with Sarah White as lead designer, Corey White as front-end 
>developer, and Anna providing critical review and feedback—has been working
>on a new logo and overall branding update. We have now reached the next step
>planned in the meeting: a PR for updating the website. The new branding is
>detailed on the Brand page in the PR. Please review the Brand page
>screenshot in the PR (or a locally compiled version) and cast your vote on
>the new branding in this motion.
>
>
>
>
>https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-website/pull/506
>(https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-website/pull/506)
>
>Since branding implementation is complex, here’s what this motion is
>approving: During the PSC meeting, we agreed on the general direction,
>specific colors, and overall look of the logo. This motion is to formally 
>adopt the new branding as described on the Brand page.
>
>For practical reasons, the PR updates the entire website. However, approval
>of the PR itself and specific website design choices are not part of this 
>motion. The web theme visualized on and linked from the page is only a
>possible application of the branding. That said, you can explore the full 
>website to see how the new branding plays out in practice. You may review 
>the PR independently or in relation to this motion. Additionally, any
>technical issues discovered later with the logo or the branding are also not
>subject of the motion such as vector graphics issues with the logo files, 
>their raster versions, or need for additional green color for buttons. This
>is just to say that PSC does not need to review and approve every vertex in
>the vector file or foresee all color needs.
>
>Once approved, the NC State team is ready to begin applying the new branding
>alongside the transition to the name GRASS.
>
>
>
>Let me know if you have any questions,
>
>
>Vaclav
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>grass-psc mailing list
>grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20250327/67b63ba3/attachment.htm>


More information about the grass-psc mailing list