[GRASS-PSC] [Motion] Adopt new logo and branding

[Anna Petrášová]

+1

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:32 PM Paulo van Breugel via grass-psc <
grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Great +1
>
>
> On March 27, 2025 12:35:05 PM GMT+01:00, "Linda Karlovská via grass-psc" <
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> I like it very much! The logo is simple and impactful, especially the
>> gradient version looks really nice.
>> +1
>> Linda
>>
>> ---------- Původní e-mail ----------
>> Od: Vaclav Petras via grass-psc <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Komu: GRASS-PSC <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Datum: 25. 3. 2025 23:21:52
>> Předmět: [GRASS-PSC] [Motion] Adopt new logo and branding
>>
>> Dear GRASS PSC Members,
>>
>> As discussed in the 2025-02-14 meeting, our team at NC State
>> University—led by myself, with Sarah White as lead designer, Corey White as
>> front-end developer, and Anna providing critical review and feedback—has
>> been working on a new logo and overall branding update. We have now reached
>> the next step planned in the meeting: a PR for updating the website. The
>> new branding is detailed on the Brand page in the PR. Please review the
>> Brand page screenshot in the PR (or a locally compiled version) and cast
>> your vote on the new branding in this motion.
>>
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-website/pull/506
>>
>> Since branding implementation is complex, here’s what this motion is
>> approving: During the PSC meeting, we agreed on the general direction,
>> specific colors, and overall look of the logo. This motion is to formally
>> adopt the new branding as described on the Brand page.
>>
>> For practical reasons, the PR updates the entire website. However,
>> approval of the PR itself and specific website design choices are not part
>> of this motion. The web theme visualized on and linked from the page is
>> only a possible application of the branding. That said, you can explore the
>> full website to see how the new branding plays out in practice. You may
>> review the PR independently or in relation to this motion. Additionally,
>> any technical issues discovered later with the logo or the branding are
>> also not subject of the motion such as vector graphics issues with the logo
>> files, their raster versions, or need for additional green color for
>> buttons. This is just to say that PSC does not need to review and approve
>> every vertex in the vector file or foresee all color needs.
>>
>> Once approved, the NC State team is ready to begin applying the new
>> branding alongside the transition to the name GRASS.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions,
>> Vaclav
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-psc mailing list
>> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20250328/750e9d77/attachment.htm>